Press "Enter" to skip to content

International Air-Safety Regulators Panel Criticized FAA Approval of 737 MAX

An international air-safety regulators panel is finishing a report, which is anticipated to criticize the preliminary U.S. consent process for Boeing Co’s 737 MAX jets, based on reports, citing people briefed on the conclusions.

As a part of the panel’s findings, the task force will name out the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) the U.S. for what it says is an absence of readability and transparency in the best way the company delegated authority to Boeing to evaluate sure flight-control options, the Journal reported on Monday.

The conclusion in a few of these essential design modifications didn’t receive sufficient attention from the FAA, the report added.

The panel is anticipated to name for greater data-sharing and transparency amongst different governments, based on reports, with the draft report suggesting reviewing and renewing FAA guidance and day-to-day certification methods to ensure the agency’s early engagement in new onboard systems.

The multi-agency panel is named the Joint Authorities Technical Review (JATR) and contains air-security regulators from Canada, China, Indonesia, the UAE, the EU, Brazil, and the United States. It’s anticipated to release the report in the next few weeks, the statement mentioned.

Boeing’s 737 MAX was grounded worldwide in March after two lethal crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia inside five months of each other. The FAA on Monday said its new chief, Stephen Dickson, plans to journey to Seattle this week to fly “newly configured” Boeing 737 MAX software in a simulator.